Approximately 30 to 40% of patients present with evidence of metastatic disease. The more a community uses screening techniques such as PSA and digital rectal exam on a regular basis, the lower this percentage. If cancers are detected at an early potentially curable stage they can be offered curative treatment including radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Categorical recommendations for individual patients cannot be made on the basis of the medical literature since valid comparisons of various strategies are lacking and since owing to recent advances in detection and treatment much of the previous literature is outdated. In making decisions about treatment, emphasis should be placed not only on the established value of various treatments and also the characteristics of the cancer but also factors such as quality of life, and the age and health of the individual. It is also important to understand the natural history of the disease. Albertson et al have 15 year follow up data on people managed with watchful waiting alone. Lu-Yao et al have 10-year data comparing watchful waiting to surgery and radiotherapy. This information is useful as a starting point.
Treatment options for localised cancer
The following is an extract of Professor Stricker's Modern Medicine article Part 2.
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in Australian men,and the choice of treatment for each individual will depend on many factors. All options must be discussed fully with the patient prior to making any therapeutic decisions.
The management options for localised, potentially curable prostate cancer are:
External beam radiotherapy
Low dose rate brachytherapy (seed therapy)
Combination radiotherapy - i.e. high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy
Factors that need to be taken into consideration when selecting treatment include:
- characteristics of the cancer (including the clinical stage, Gleason score, PSA level and histological characteristics)
- the size of the prostate and presence of urinary symptoms
- the patient�s age, comorbidities and life expectancy
- general body characteristics (such as obesity, previous radiotherapy or injury).
Each patient�s concerns and priorities need to be assessed, with regard to cure as well as to potential side effects. It is mandatory that a full discussion of all options be undertaken prior to making a therapeutic decision because each form of therapy has its own indications, cure rate and complications.
Second opinions (clinical and pathological) are being encouraged.
Radical prostatectomy can be achieved in many ways. It can either be performed by the standard retro pubic approach, via the perineal approach, by the laparoscopic approach, or using a robotic interface. All of these operations aim to achieve the same thing. They aim to remove the prostate with the least possible side effects, and the greatest chance of cure with the least possible long-term urinary incontinence and the least possible effect on sexual function.
Neo adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy has been shown to delay recurrence and possibly improve survival.
The ideal patient for radical prostatectomy is a man who accepts the risks of surgery, is aware of all his options, and has a clinically localised can-cer with at least 10 years of life expectancy. Patients are usually in hospital for three to six days, and have a catheter for three to nine days (including hospitalised days).
For localised cancer, the cure rates for radical prostatectomy (10-year, PSA-progression-free survival) are 85% for organ-confined disease and 82% for specimen-confined disease. In a series of over 1000 cases, the overall 10-year actuarial disease-free survival was approximately 60%. These results can be improved further if adjuvant radiotherapy is used in patients who have extracapsular disease or a positive surgical margin. If a PSA recurrence occurs some time after surgery, the time to death from prostate cancer still averages 13 years and may therefore not impact on the life expectancy of an older man. Even patients with poorly differentiated tumours can be cured surgically if the disease is detected while confined to the organ.
Side effects of treatment (including incontinence and impotence) have become less common with improved surgical techniques and patient selection. In an Australian surgical series at St Vincent�s Hospital in Sydney of 732 patients, there was a zero mortality; the major compli-cation rate in the last 200 cases was less than 3%, with a 1% incidence of severe incontinence.
Although impotence remains a common problem of surgery, an erectile nerve-sparing procedure can preserve potency in up to 70% of carefully selected patients, especially those in younger age groups. The technique has improved continuously over the past 10 years, as has the selection of patients to undergo the procedure.
At this stage, the use of sural nerve grafts should be regarded as experimental, but promising.
The likelihood of impotence is dependent on many factors, including the preoperative erections, standard of nerve sparing, duration of follow up and the use of early stimulation of erections. Some patients with partial recovery of erections will respond to sildenafil (Viagra), generally from at least one year after surgery. After a sufficient recovery period, up to 70% of younger men with normal preoperative erections can have a satisfactory return of erections (possibly up to 80% with sildenafil).
Radical radiation therapy is still an important management option for patients with localised prostate cancer. For low risk cancers, the results are similar to those of surgery; however, the relapse rate appears to be higher if the cancer becomes more extensive or more aggressive.
Traditionally, radiotherapy has been delivered over six or seven weeks. The advantage of radiotherapy is that it can be performed on unfit patients and patients who wish to avoid surgery. The disadvantage is the difficulty of salvage surgery if it fails; on the other hand, radiotherapy may safely follow surgery. Short term side effects include radiation sickness, proctitis and cystitis, all of which usually resolve within three to six months. In many patients, rectal compliance decreases, leading to frequent bowel actions.
Traditional radiotherapy has lacked accuracy and resulted in damage to adjacent organs, leading to a 3 to 5% incidence of serious damage to the bowel and bladder and a 50% incidence of impotence. Side effects have been reduced and results improved by three new concepts - dose escalation (which provides higher doses of radiotherapy, such as brachytherapy), conformal radiotherapy (which uses modern technology to focus radiotherapy more accurately and minimise damage to adjacent organs), and adjuvant hormone therapy.
Low dose rate brachytherapy involves the implantation of radioactive pellets or seeds into the prostate (Figure 1). The technique is only suitable for patients who have a low risk cancer and a small prostate, as well as minimal urinary symptoms. The ideal patient is a man over 60 years of age who satisfies these criteria and wishes to minimise the side effects of therapy.
The great advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy are its single-session, outpatient nature and minimal morbidity. The 10-year, disease-specific survival for low risk cancers is identical to surgery; 14-year data from the USA suggest that this modality can control the disease in 60% of patients. Side effects are minimal, with incontinence and rectal damage being rare. Impotence may occur in 50% of patients, but it is generally less severe than that occurring after surgery, and responds well to sildenafil.
In the largest series in Australia (almost 200 cases), which was conducted at St Vincent�s Hospital in Sydney, side effects have been minimal and results appear to be comparable to international results.
Combination radiotherapy involves high dose rate brachytherapy given in combination with a much lower dose of external beam radiotherapy. High dose rate brachytherapy requires placement of hollow iridium wires into the prostate under general anaesthesia; radiotherapy is administered through the wires for the next 48 hours (Figure 2). This technique allows a much greater dosage to be applied to the prostate and can be performed very accurately with CT guidance.
The advantages of high dose rate brachytherapy are minimising damage to the adjacent rectum and maximising the dosage (especially for more aggressive tumours) to increase the chance of cure. International data for this treatment combination have resulted in 10-year disease-free survival rates of 80 to 90% ñ even in men with cancers of intermediate grade.
In more aggressive tumours that may not be amenable to surgery, combination therapy or newer forms of conformal radiotherapy may become the standard of care. Therefore, the ideal patient for high dose brachytherapy is a man who has a more locally advanced high grade cancer that may have extended beyond the capsule and a low chance of surgical cure.
The incidence of rectal damage with high dose rate brachytherapy in combin-ation with external beam radiotherapy has decreased to as low as 1%. The sideeffect profile in a series at Sydneyís St Vincentís Hospital has been excellent.
Watchful waiting involves regular digital rectal examinations (DRE) and PSA estimations, and possible repeat biopsies in patients with known prostate cancer. Over a period of 15 years, patients with well differentiated tumours have a very low chance of dying of their cancer and a much higher chance of dying of other diseases. This is especially true in elderly patients, and watchful waiting has therefore become particularly appropriate for elderly men who have small, well differentiated tumours and a life expectancy of less than 15 years.
The watchful waiting approach is rarely (if ever) recommended for younger men or for those with more aggressive tumours. In a study of 514 patients, 75% of men diagnosed before the age of 70 years died as a result of their cancer. Some younger patients with well differentiated tumours will, however, defer treatment until there is evidence of progression.
Two disadvantages of watchful wait-ing are the unpredictable nature of the tumour and the fact that PSA levels do not necessarily reflect its growth. (The latter is particularly true in patients taking hormone medications that may affect PSA readings, making it even more diffi-cult to follow these patients.)
Treatment for advanced cancer
Patients with advanced prostate cancer are generally men who have extensive disease in the pelvis, metastases in the lymph nodes or bone or a PSA level greater than 50 ng/mL, or men in whom local treatment has failed. Bilateral orchidectomy is the gold standard for testosterone reduction. However, although it offers immediate relief from metastatic pain and eliminates problems of compliance, orchidectomy is psychologically unacceptable to most men. Hormone therapy is the mainstay of treatment in this group. When hormone therapy is commenced, the vast majority of patients get excellent initial symptomatic relief, even in the presence of painful metastases. Regular PSA measurements are the best way to monitor response. Some patients elect to delay hormone therapy in the interest of avoiding side effects. These men may have had a PSA recurrence after failed initial therapy or be older asymptomatic men with metastatic disease. In patients who have less advanced disease, the cancer ultimately becomes refractory to hormone therapy (after three to five years, or even longer). Most patients who develop hormone refractory disease die within 12 months.
Which hormones should be used?
Leuprorelin acetate (Lucrin) and goserelin acetate (Zoladex), which are LHRH analogues, are commonly used for chemical castration. However, these agents cause an initial testosterone flare that should be prevented with concomitant use of an antiandrogen for the first two to four weeks� duration. LHRH analogues are available in monthly, three-monthly and, more recently, four-monthly depot preparations. The nonsteroidal antiandrogens flutamide (Eulexin, Flutamin, Fugerel), bicalutamide (Cosudex) and nilutamide (Anandron) have similar action. These agents are generally used in association with LHRH analogues, but can be used alone in sexually active men to sometimes prevent impotence. Careful monitoring of liver function tests is essential in patients taking antiandrogens.
Cyproterone acetate (Androcur, Cyprone, Procur) is a steroidal antiandrogen that can be used alone or with LHRH analogues. Oestrogens have fallen out of favour because of their cardiovascular side effects.
Should hormones be commenced immediately or later, or intermittently?
Immediate hormone therapy is appropriate for symptomatic patients; however, its timing in asymptomatic patients remains controversial. There is increasing evidence to suggest that earlier use of hormone therapy improves survival, but this benefit must be balanced against side effects. Most patients choose immediate therapy, although older asymptomatic patients may choose delayed therapy after informed consent. Patients with a PSA recurrence after previous failed surgery or radiotherapy often opt for a period of observation to ascertain the rate of PSA rise prior to commencing hormone therapy.
The use of intermittent hormone therapy has become increasingly popular in patients with less advanced disease. Although the benefits of intermittent therapy are less proven, it clearly improves quality of life in patients with less advanced disease who are destined to use hormones for very long periods. The aim of this therapy is to depress PSA to undetectable levels, wait until it rises again to a predetermined level (such as 10 ng/mL), then commence a further pulse of hormones. This approach gives patients longer periods free of side effects of hormone therapy, such as impotence, depression, lethargy and osteoporosis.
How should hormone therapy be monitored?
Hormonal therapy is best monitored by regular measurement of PSA levels. To assess effectiveness in suppressing testosterone, a serum testosterone can be used and, if not completely suppressed, an anti-androgen can be added. A combination of castration (medical or surgical) and anti-androgen therapy may be used to block both testicular and adrenal androgen activity. Since the results of major trials have recently become available, enthusiasm for this combination has decreased, but it still tends to be used in young men with early metastatic disease.
How should side effects of hormone therapy be managed?
The side effects of hormones must be managed individually (see Table 2). Hot flushes may be treated with cyproterone, clonidine (Catapres 100) or oestrogen; lethargy may be improved by giving hormones intermittently. Osteoporosis may develop in patients destined to use hormone therapy for long periods; in this group, bone density should be checked at 12 months and therapy such as intravenous or oral bisphosphonates should be used if significant deminerali-sation is present.
To view information on Hormone Therapy just download the .pdf by clicking here.
What can we do when hormones no longer work?
When hormone therapy fails, most treatment is palliative. Serum testosterone should always be checked to ensure hor-mone therapy has been achieving castrate levels of testosterone. Therapeutic options include:
- localised radiotherapy or strontium-89 (Metastron) radiotherapy to painful metastatic deposits - second-line hormone therapy - chemotherapy - cyclophosphamide (Cycloblastin, Endoxan-Asta), mitozantrone hydrochloride (Mitozantrone Injection, Novantrone, Onkotrone), docetaxel (Taxotere) - corticosteroids and pain relief.
A team approach to palliation is important to provide maximal quality of life in men who have hormone refractory cancer, and may include antidepressants, psychological support and hospice services. Promising new approaches include gene therapy, antiangiogenesis drugs such as thalidomide, immunological approaches, and growth factor blocking drugs.
It is mandatory to tailor therapy for prostate cancer to the individual. Modern treatments, including newer surgical techniques and improved conformal delivery of radiotherapy, have resulted in a significant decrease in side effects and improved outcomes. Further knowledge about biochemical markers, the results of new and improved techniques and more established results of known treatments will help us to individualise treatment, resulting in better control of the disease and fewer side effects.
To view the complete article including all tables and illustrations click here to download the PDF.
How to choose between treatments. Click here